UW Gazette, November 15, 1995 Dr. Sehdev Kumar, whose discipline under UW Policy 53 was announced by the president two weeks ago, has accepted the Gazette's invitation to make a statement. Here are his words: I maintain now, as I have done since the allegations publicized in the President's statement of November 1 were first made more than one year ago, that they are totally false and fabricated. I reaffirm that in directing Himalayan Field Study Program - a non-UW program, sponsored and administered by Canada-Commonwealth Human Ecology Council - I did absolutely nothing wrong by any deed, word or gesture. President Downey decided on June 1 to impose a fine on me in connection with these allegations. It must be noted however that the President's decision - arrived at with care - cannot be equated with that of an impartial third party tribunal, since no formal hearings were held at any stage by the administration in accordance with the principles of natural justice. Also, in two recent cases with similar allegations, mine and that of Professor X (as identified by the Faculty Association), for the first time in the history of the University, the administration chose to address complaints under Policy 53, rather than refer them to the Ethics Committee, comprising a student, a professor and a staff member. The Ethics Committee conducts its hearings in accordance with the principles of natural justice. On June 29, I appealed the President's decision. However, on October 13, I suffered a severe heart problem and was rushed to the emergency room of KW Hospital. Because of the fragility of my health, the extreme emotional strain I have been subjected to over the past year, and because of my very poor financial situation, on the urging of my family and friends, I withdrew my appeal on October 18, 1995. At that time, it was made very clear to the University that the withdrawal of my appeal was not to be construed as an admission of any wrongdoing. In withdrawing my appeal, I chose to accept the President's decision rather than face the risk to my health, and to return to my research and teaching, which is for me a vocation and a calling. It was in this spirit of goodwill that I expressed to the President, the Dean and the students concerned my profound regrets for having been regarded "as the cause of emotional and other strain to several members of the university community". While withdrawing my appeal authorized the President to impose the penalty on me, it did not authorize him to publicize and endorse the allegations against me. The President's public statement amounts to an extremely onerous additional penalty imposed on me after the fact, apparently in response to political pressure. Moreover, to the best of my knowledge, publication of such a statement in this manner is unprecedented in the history of the University. I fully support all demands for the revision of university policies to deal with allegations of ethical misconduct in the most thorough and fair manner. In doing so, I believe extensive inputs from all groups - students, faculty, staff - are necessary. To respond fully to the charges against me contained in the President's statement would inevitably require naming names and breaching confidentiality; it would also require reference to hundreds of documents, earlier submitted to the President, and the statements of many others. For these reasons, and because of the uncertain state of my health, I do not believe that it would be appropriate or even possible to respond to the charges here. I derive great satisfaction from the fact that here at the University, since 1984, I have been nominated for "Distinguished Teacher Award" seven times by hundreds of my students, and that in their various evaluations and testimonials, I have been called a "wonderful teacher", "open", "inspiring", "helpful", "intellectually and spiritually stimulating", and "most knowledgeable". Despite recent personally devastating events I will continue to serve my students in the best ways possible.